"Article 11 of the P2B Regulation imposes an obligation to provide an internal system for handling the complaints of business users, which seems to cover very similar terrain to that proposed by Article 17 of the EMFA."
1 / 8
"I've got a question as to why the Article 17 EMFA media privilege is in fact necessary. Does it add anything? Because, I'm not clear what it specifically does."
2 / 8
"Having two very similar provisions, but in slightly different wording could be confusing as to what's actually required and for whom."
3 / 8
"When considering Article 17 EMFA, we need to understand what it is that it adds over and above Article 11 P2B Regulation (...). This is in the interests of both service provider and media organisation."
4 / 8
"The idea of giving media complaints priority: (...) [news has] a very short shelf life, shorter than that of a lettuce."
5 / 8
"‘Priority’ says that it is more important than any other complaints. What happens to the complaints of users under the DSA in other areas?"
6 / 8
"You could have a situation where a snippet of little news value is being prioritised over revenge porn: that does not seem to me to be right."
7 / 8
"If we keep the Article 17 EMFA media privilege (...): we should think more clearly about providing safeguards so that this procedure is not in competition for resources with other procedures for other users."
8 / 8
❮
❯