Subscribe on LinkedIn

Two Megaphones and an Empty Room: The Need to Write the Copyright Reform for the Empty Seats

The EU copyright review is being argued by two blocs of private interests. The party that will live with the result, the public, was never really in the room. That was a choice by those who drafted the consultation. That is not a good thing. Two private interests are shouting at each other across the European Commission's copyright review, and the room they are shouting in is empty. On one side stand rightholders. On the...

Brussels Revisits Copyright – Part 3: Why an Optional Research Exception Is No Exception at All

This is the third and final installment in a series analysing the European Commission's current call for evidence on EU copyright rules. Part 1 examined live content piracy and the fundamental rights implications of enforcement without safeguards. Part 2 examined the push for mandatory AI training licences and why the mechanism would harm the creators it claims to protect. This post focuses on the research exception: a provision that has been optional for twenty-five...

Brussels Revisits Copyright –  Part 2: Why Mandatory AI Licensing Is Not a Silver Bullet And Could Ricochet

This is the second installment in a three-part series analysing the European Commission's current call for evidence on EU copyright rules. Part 1 examined live content piracy and the fundamental rights implications of enforcement without safeguards. This post focuses on text and data mining (TDM) and the push for mandatory AI training licences; the third piece will explore the research exception. The European Commission's call for evidence to support its review of the Directive on...

Brussels Revisits Copyright –  Part 1: Why the Rush to Block Live Sports Piracy Threatens Fundamental Rights

This is the first installment in a three-part series analyzing the European Commission’s current call for evidence on EU copyright rules. This post focuses on live content piracy; subsequent pieces will explore text and data mining (TDM) and the research exception.  The European Commission has launched a call for evidence, which closes on 25 June, to support two parallel workstreams: the review of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (DCDSM); and, the preparatory work...

From Buzzword to Blueprint? The EU Tech Sovereignty Package Has Landed

A year ago, we argued that digital sovereignty was Europe's favourite empty buzzword: elastic enough for everyone to project their fears onto, specific enough to satisfy no one. Yesterday, the European Commission adopted a package that tries, with notable seriousness, to prove that argument wrong. The Tech Sovereignty Package was postponed three times since March 2026. Those delays were themselves informative: reporting suggested that language around preferential treatment for European providers was carefully managed to...

It’s a Trap: Why Strengthening Copyright to Protect Creators Will Do The Opposite

Admiral Ackbar, the rebel commander from Return of the Jedi, is remembered for exactly one line: "It's a trap." The European Commission's call for evidence on the CDSM Directive review, open until 25 June 2026, deserves the same warning. Two recent analyses, one legal, one economic, converge on the same conclusion: reaching for copyright to manage the disruption caused by generative AI is a misdiagnosis. The legal framework was not built for this problem. The...

The Stories We Are Told About AI: Introducing the “AI: Tools or Gods?” Podcast

Every week, a new claim about artificial intelligence enters the public conversation. AI will take your job. AI will save democracy. AI is already smarter than you. Some of these claims are true. Some are marketing. Some are mythology dressed as inevitability. Most are doing political work that nobody has bothered to name. The work of information labs has always been to name that work. That is what the research does. That is what the...

Deepfakes Are Not a Copyright Problem. Stop Pretending They Are.

There is a thought experiment in legal philosophy about the drunk man and the lamp post. A man loses his keys in a dark alley but searches for them under the lamp post, because the light is better there. When asked why he is not looking in the alley, he says: "Well, I can see here." Several policymakers and legislative drafters, from the Netherlands to the United States, are currently searching for their keys under...

Designed for Atoms, Broken for Bits: How Copyright Law is Locking Europe Out of Its Own Knowledge

Imagine inheriting a magnificent library. Shelves floor to ceiling. Rare manuscripts, out-of-print novels, decades of scientific journals. You are entrusted with it not as an owner, but as a custodian: the person whose job is to make sure it is still there for the next generation. Now imagine that, one by one, someone begins replacing those books with laminated cards. Each card says the same thing: "The content of this book is available. Please...

India’s AI & Copyright Consultation: Why the Proposed Model Misses the Mark

Technology policy often struggles because of how problems are framed. Small definitional choices—about what a technology does, what a legal right protects, or where harm actually occurs—can have outsized regulatory consequences. India’s consultation on generative AI and copyright sits squarely within this global challenge. The key question is not whether to act, but whether the model being proposed accurately reflects how AI systems work and what copyright law is designed to regulate. Concern and ambition...